アンナ・カリンスカヤ

This page uses Javascript. Please enable Javascript in your browser. Skip to Content Japanese English Chinese About RIETI Site Map Help Contact Discussion Papers Search Site Search Menu Research Areas Research Programs (FY2024-2028) Research Programs (FY2020-2023) Research Programs (FY2016-2019) Research Programs (FY2011-2015) Policy Research Domains (FY2006-2010) Projects Survey Fellows According to Title Alphabetical order RIETI Alumni Research/Policy Papers Discussion Papers (English) Discussion Papers (Japanese) Policy Discussion Papers (English) Policy Discussion Papers (Japanese) Technical Papers (English) Technical Papers (Japanese) Non Technical Summaries List of Articles in Journals Research Digest Discussion Papers Search Publications RIETI Books (English) RIETI Books (Japanese) History of Japan's Trade and Industry Policy Authors' Words Other Publications (English) Other Publications (Japanese) Events Symposiums Workshops BBL Seminars Archived Seminar Series Data JIP Database R-JIP Database CIP Database Industry-Specific Nominal and Real Effective Exchange Rates AMU and AMU Deviation Indicators JSTAR RIETI-TID RIETI FDI Database ICPA Project Links Articles Column Special Series Newspapers & Magazines Fellows' Works VoxEU Column From IZA Perspectives from Around the World Other Contents RIETI Report Policy Update Keizai Sangyo Journal (METI Journal) Research Areas Fellows Research/Policy Papers Publications Events Data Articles Site Map Technical Issues Coontact Discussion Papers Search Close HomeArticlesSpecial SeriesIssues Facing the Japanese Economy in 2012 (January 2012) Issues Facing the Japanese Economy in 2012 (January 2012) The First Year of Renewable Energy Tweet Print OHASHI Hiroshi Faculty Fellow, RIETI 2012 as a turning point for postwar systemsIn 2011, postwar social and economic systems were considerably destabilized both inside and outside Japan. Overseas, the Arab Spring movement, which began with rioting in Tunisia, has continued to spread, while the euro crisis triggered by the Greek credit uncertainty is still under way. In Japan, the accident at Tokyo Electric Power Company's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant caused by the Great East Japan Earthquake, one of the largest earthquakes recorded in Japan, raised the question about the country's postwar energy supply structure. Will the tattered postwar social and economic systems be required to make more drastic changes? Or will they be restored and returned to their former states? 2012 might become a turning point in thinking about the future of the 21st century social and economic systems.Since the March 11 disaster, it appears that the Japanese economy has been swayed by the rising yen's value and the country's energy policy in disarray. For the energy policy in particular, with procedures for resuming nuclear power plant operations still uncertain, the government on December 1 began its appeal to the public to reduce electricity consumption. Numerical goals have been set in the areas where power supply and demand are particularly tight. Especially, Kansai Electric Power Company has set a tough target of a 10% reduction on a year-to-year basis in light of the fact that 10 out of its 11 nuclear reactors have been shut down. Some power companies have introduced a system to offer discounts for company users according to the percentage of power savings. However, given that there is only a small difference in power consumption between peak and off-peak hours during winter, electricity savings might mean production drops for companies. Thus, it is worried that corporate activities and employment might be affected considerably. In this situation, along with independent power generation, renewable energy sources are expected to be new power sources. The first year of renewable energyWith the feed-in tariff (FIT) system scheduled to be implemented in Japan in July 2012, renewable energy has attracted attention from many companies. As for solar power generation, a system to purchase surplus electricity has already been introduced in the country. The scope of the system will be extended to other practicable renewable energy sources under the FIT system, and electric power companies will be obliged to purchase the entire electricity generated by such energy sources. Like the existing surplus electricity purchase system, costs required for purchasing will be added to electricity charges in the form of surcharges, which will be borne by electricity users, such as households and companies. The minister of Economy, Trade and Industry will announce a purchase period and the purchase price (hereafter collectively "purchase conditions") after hearing opinions from ministers concerned and respecting the opinions of the Purchase Price Calculation Committee, a neutral third-party panel to be established with the consent of the Diet. Since purchase conditions are an important policy variable in the promotion of renewable energy use, domestic and overseas companies are anxiously waiting for the purchase conditions to be announced. Certainly, 2012 will become the first year of renewable energy for Japan.After the establishment of Purchase Price Calculation Committee expected in early 2012, purchase conditions are expected to be determined. The committee will be required to present the conditions that will help promote renewable energy use in a cost-effective and efficient manner, by minimizing the public burden that will be imposed by higher electricity prices. I wish to discuss below two policy issues related to the purchase conditions. How should the purchase price be determined?It is obvious that the longer the purchase period and the higher the purchase price, the more that renewable energy use would be promoted. What should be done from a policy viewpoint is to design a way for the purchase conditions to promote renewable energy use in an efficient manner, while minimizing the public burden. In view of the cost-effective promotion of renewable energy use, it would be advisable to use market mechanisms effectively. Specifically, purchase conditions should be established to ensure the competitive introduction of various energy sources by form, type, and size of installation. If there are no dynamic effects that are expected to continue in the future, such as the learning-by-doing effect or inter-temporal scale economies, it is desirable that purchase conditions are the same for different energy sources. This would facilitate the introduction giving priority to the most efficient energy source. In reality, however, even if generation costs are high at present, such costs are expected to drop sharply in the future due to learning by doing. Thus, it would be appropriate to adjust purchase conditions for each energy source according to the degree of the learning-by-doing effect. Purchase conditions should be elaborated by reviewing the extent to which the learning-by-doing effect has worked in the past and taking into account the magnitude of future cost reductions.When designing purchase conditions, the report released by the National Policy Unit on December 19, 2011, will serve as a helpful reference. The report discusses in detail the estimated future generation costs for each electricity source, including the premises of the calculations. However, it appears that the generation costs calculations in the report need close examination in several aspects, even insofar as renewable energy sources are concerned. For instance, looking at solar power generation, which is expected to play a core role in the FIT system, between 2010 and 2030 power generation costs are estimated to drop by 47%-70% and 42%-60% for residential solar power systems and mega solar systems, respectively. These estimates are largely based on the assumption that the progress rate of learning effect would be 80%. However, it should be verified whether this assumption was correct in Japan in the past. As far as my analysis shows1, power generation costs of residential solar systems were estimated to have dropped by only 30% during the 10 years from 1997 to 2007, after taking into account profit margins. If learning effect continues to work on solar power generation, the rate of drop in power generation costs by 2030 must be less than this figure2. In order to avoid misjudging the direction of policy, it is hoped that discussions will be held based on past data during public participation verification work planned in the future. Remember to think from an international perspective As for the Feed-in Tariff Act, both houses of the Diet passed a supplementary provision, providing for "With regard to renewable energy power generation facilities, (omission) quality assurance must be provided, maintenance contracts must be made, and other strict standards must be adopted." A certain level of quality assurance will be essential from the perspective of consumer protection. However, excessively strict standards would be undesirable to reduce the public burden. Moreover, such standards may act as a hindrance to Japanese companies entering overseas markets. In light of the intense competition for solar power generation in overseas markets, it is understandable that some experts argue that certain actions should be taken to protect the domestic market. In order to revitalize Japanese industries using the feed-in tariff system as a trigger, however, it would be desirable to establish quality-related standards that meet international standards with a view to attracting overseas markets. How should differentiation be promoted to be accepted by overseas markets without degrading renewable energies to commodities traded on the market? We should not get carried away at the beginning of the first year of renewable energy. December 28, 2011>> Original text in Japanese Footnote(s) See "Wagakuni ni okeru zenryo kaitori seido no kadai—Taiyoko hatsuden ni chumoku shite (Issues with systems for purchasing the full amount of power generated by renewable energy sources in Japan—Focusing on solar power generation)," Kankyo Keizai Seisaku Kenkyu (Environmental Economics and Policy Studies), Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 60-63, 2011.Of course, there may be discussion that the degree of learning effect varies by technology, such as polycrystalline and thin film systems. Although prices are expected to drop considerably due to competition with foreign companies, that cannot be called a learning effect without drops in generation costs. Tweet December 28, 2011 Print Article(s) by this author Review of Electricity System Reform: We must dispel concerns over stable supply in non-crisis periods August 16, 2022［Newspapers & Magazines］ GAFA and Competition Policy: Japan's Uniqueness in Public-Private Joint Regulation November 19, 2021［Newspapers & Magazines］ Designing Regulatory and Institutional Systems through Public-Private Cooperation—Industrial Policy for the 21st Century September 28, 2020［Newspapers & Magazines］ The Steep Path for Global Warming Countermeasures: Do not disregard the cost of renewable energy March 18, 2019［Newspapers & Magazines］ Competition Policy in a New Era: Market concentration in the IT world poses a challenge April 27, 2017［Newspapers & Magazines］ Articles Column Special Series Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2024 (January 2024) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2023 (January 2023) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2022 (January 2022) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2021 (January 2021) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2020 (January 2020) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2019 (January 2019) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2018 (January 2018) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2017 (January 2017) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2016 (January 2016) Fellows' Views on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2015 (January 2015) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2014 (December 2013) Issues Facing the Japanese Economy in 2013 (January 2013) Issues Facing the Japanese Economy in 2012 (January 2012) Issues Facing the Japanese Economy in 2009 (January 2009) Issues Facing the Japanese Economy in 2008 (January 2008) Issues Facing the Japanese Economy in 2007 (January 2007) RIETI Fellows' View on Incident at Japanese Consulate-General in Shenyang (June 2002) Newspapers & Magazines Fellows' Works VoxEU Column From IZA Perspectives from Around the World Other Contents RIETI Report Policy Update Keizai Sangyo Journal Communications Newsletter RSS Feed Facebook X YouTube Research Areas Research Programs (FY2024-2028) Research Programs (FY2020-2023) Research Programs (FY2016-2019) Research Programs (FY2011-2015) Policy Research Domains (FY2006-2010) Projects Survey Fellows Research/Policy Papers Discussion Papers (English) Discussion Papers (Japanese) Policy Discussion Papers (English) Policy Discussion Papers (Japanese) Technical Papers (English) Technical Papers (Japanese) Non Technical Summaries List of Articles in Journals Research Digest Discussion Papers Search Publications RIETI Books (English) RIETI Books (Japanese) History of Japan's Trade and Industry Policy Authors' Words Other Publications (English) Other Publications (Japanese) Events Symposiums Workshops BBL Seminars Archived Seminar Series Data JIP Database R-JIP Database CIP Database Industry-Specific Nominal and Real Effective Exchange Rates AMU and AMU Deviation Indicators JSTAR RIETI-TID RIETI FDI Database ICPA Project Links Articles Column Special Series Newspapers & Magazines Fellows' Works VoxEU Column From IZA Perspectives from Around the World Other Contents RIETI Report Policy Update Keizai Sangyo Journal (METI Journal) About RIETI Privacy Policy Site Policy Site Map Help Contact METI Web Site Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry, IAA (JCN 6010005005426)JCN: Japan Corporate Number Opinions expressed or implied on this website are solely those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of the Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).Titles, numbers, specific names, etc. on this website are as of the date of publication. In the case of reposting material from our website, contact us beforehand. Top